ECON 201: Principles of Microeconomics
Lecture 3
Today: opportunity cost, economic rent, and incentives, which explain how we choose.
Next class: comparative advantage and specialization, which decide who does what.
How do you put a number on the cost of circling around the parking lot?
Attaching a monetary value to a benefit works the same way: what something is worth to you is the most you would pay to get it.
Go to menti.com
Code: 9888 6085
A good friend invites you to Saturday’s Dodgers game. What is the most you would pay for the whole day, including ticket, parking, food, and gas?
Answers are anonymous. One number, in dollars.

The most you would pay is your willingness to pay, and it is your benefit: what the day is worth to you.
Back to menti.com
Code: 9888 6085
Ticket, parking, food, and gas come to $100 for the day. Do you go?
Yes, no, or I am undecided.

One way to make this decision would be to look at the net benefit:
\[\text{net benefit} = \text{benefit} - \text{direct cost}\]
So a simple rule could be:
However, something is missing from this equation: what else could you have done with your Saturday? Whether the game is worth it depends on your next best alternative, sometimes also called your outside option.
Back to menti.com
Code: 9888 6085
Forget the game for a second. What is the least they would have to pay you to work a four-hour shift on a Saturday, if your other option were a free afternoon at home?
One number, in dollars.

Notice the switch. For the game the cost came priced and you judged the benefit. For the shift the benefit comes priced and you judged the cost.
Back to menti.com
Code: 9888 6085
The rec center shift is on the table: $120 for four hours. Do you still go to the game?
Yes, no, or I am undecided.

Meet Sam, who is an econ major and also a sports lover.
| Go to the game | Work the shift | |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit | $200 | $120 |
| Direct cost | $100 | $80 |
| Net benefit | $100 | $40 |
Sam should go to the game: it brings more net benefit than the outside option of working the shift.
The final decision rule: take the action if its net benefit is greater than its opportunity cost. For Sam: $100 > $40, so go to the game.
Economic cost:
\[\text{economic cost} = \text{direct cost} + \text{opportunity cost}\]
For the game: $100 + $40 = $140. (The decision rule can also be stated as benefit > economic cost: $200 > $140.)
Economic rent:
\[\text{economic rent} = \text{net benefit of the action chosen} - \text{opportunity cost}\]
For Sam: $100 - $40 = $60. Positive rent means the move is worth making; zero rent means you are indifferent.
Worksheet, Activity 1: Sam’s table, with your own two numbers in it.
Fill it in, make the call, and check it against what you told the polls.
Back to menti.com
Code: 9888 6085
You have $10,000 in savings. A friend asks you to invest it in their business, and offers to pay you $15 every month, guaranteed, for as long as they hold it. Do you take the deal?
Yes, no, or I am undecided.

The opportunity cost of the deal is $17 a month, more than the $15 it pays. A deal that pays you every month can still lose you money.
Sometimes what you give up never shows up as a payment, so it is easy to miss.
Other times the money is visible, but it gets judged against the wrong alternative.
Why did technological progress take off, and why does it keep going? Think of firms running the same comparison you just ran.
But if adopting pays, everyone eventually adopts. Do the rents survive?